Recent Changes - Search:

CBW Home (new window)

Basic Writing @ CompFAQs


Teaching Basic Writing

Assess & Respond

Course (Re)Design

Teaching Strategies


Basic Writing Resources


Best Practices Home


Personal Writing


Collaborative Practices
Course Credit
Theme-Based Courses


BW Teacher Reading List


BW Grad Syllabi Home




edit SideBar

How does a theme-based course look? How might a theme-based course be structured?

Theme-Based Courses Home Page

Scholars tend to disagree on many issues when it comes to writing course pedagogy. For those who employ theme-based course construction, pedagogical opinions vary as widely as the topics instructors choose for their courses. But just as standard writing courses roughly follow a similar pattern in how they move students from essay to essay, so too do theme-based courses.

Generally speaking, one primary goal of basic writing courses is to help move students from introspective, self-centered writing to dialogic, externally-informed composing. Thus, most of these courses begin with personal essays, created through writing prompts that ask students to draw from little more than their own knowledge and thinking abilities. As more readings, more knowledge, are heaped upon the students, they must find ways to integrate this information into subsequent essays. At first, they may mechanically reflect the words of the published writings to which they are exposed. But if they are challenged in everyday exercises to actively engage readings, they will find ways to express interaction with texts. Ultimately, these interactions will help students internalize the material they read, equipping them to write more complex types of essays, using multiple sources in a variety of interesting ways.

Generalized example:

Essay #1—Personal Essay, informed by students’ past experiences. Provides students the opportunity to see how their relevant experiences inform their initial positioning on the topic.
Essay #2—Field research (e.g. ethnography), informed by students’ current experiences within the confines of the topic and external research, possibly into others’ experiences. Provides students with current context of the topic; helps students adjust positioning by seeing the topic from different viewpoints; initiates students into research.
Essay #3—Synthesis of newly-acquired written and experiential knowledge (e.g. research essay), informed by readings, extensive literature and field research, and previous writings of their own. Provides students the opportunity to engage lingering concerns about the topic (an unanswered question, a paradox, a perceived future problem); continues/extends the research experience; asks students to establish a framework of the topic—a scaffolding upon which they can construct intricacies of thought on the topic and examine them as deeply as possible.

Constructed around these major essays will be smaller assignments that build upon each other and toward each major essay. Such work might include, for example, reading exercises, freewrites, collaborative writing or in-class group work, journal-writing, and others.

Questions for further study

  1. Provide other frameworks for constructing a theme-based course.
  2. What other goals of a basic writing course might be fulfilled by a theme-based course construction?

To respond to these questions, you may choose to start a new FAQ or add to this one, see guidelines / instructions for Using CompFAQs Wiki

Annotated Bibliography

Bartholomae, David, and Anthony R. Petrosky. Facts, Artifacts, and Counterfacts: Theory and Method for a Reading and Writing Course. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 1986.

The foundational work in theme-based course construction specific to basic writing, this book outlines a course used by the authors, and then provides supporting studies from other voices in the field. Supporting articles deal with authority in the basic writing classroom, the discourse aspects of BRW, revision, and editing.

http://www.bedfordstmartins.com/basicbib/content/cd_cdut.html

Dickson, Marcia. It’s Not Like That Here. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 1995.

Dickson presents an alternative approach to a theme-based course from Bartholomae and Petrosky, partly in response to challenges she sees with the course construction the latter authors employ. Dickson re-envisions the coursework through the lens of a different basic writing demographic than is typically examined.

http://www.boyntoncook.com/products/0351.aspx

Molstad, Mary Frew. “Winners and Losers: A Course for Basic Writers.” Courses for Change in Writing: A Selection from the NEH/Iowa Institute. Ed., Carl H. Klaus and Nancy Jones. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook 1984. 98–105.

By framing her course within the idea of examining what defines “winning” and “losing,” Molstad attempts to focus on students developing confidence as writers. Molstad argues that because many of these students come to her class with the perception of themselves as “losers” academically, they come well-armed to examine what these terms mean in multiple contexts.

Silverman, Henry. “’The American Dream’: A Developmental Course in Writing and Learning.” Courses for Change in Writing: A Selection from the NEH/Iowa Institute. Ed., Carl H. Klaus and Nancy Jones. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook 1984. 67–74.

Silverman outlines a year-long writing intensive course run by the Department of American Thought and Language at Michigan State University which combines study of American history and culture with written communication. Silverman argues that this course, focusing on “the American dream” and directed specifically at basic writing students, will help them engage in the problems and concerns of typical American students.

Note: this department at MSU is now called the Department of Writing, Rhetoric, and American Cultures.

http://www.msu.edu/~wrac/

Edit - History - Print - Recent Changes - Search
Page last modified on January 14, 2007, at 11:11 AM